The slow ones
The firm that beat you to that site probably wasn't better. It was faster. Why lean land teams lose to bigger ones, and what actually closes the gap.
3 min

The slow ones
Here is something that does not get said enough in land: the firm that just beat you to a site is probably not better than you. It is faster.
You know the pattern. The site comes in. You know within an hour that it is a good one. Then it sits, because the appraisal needs rebuilding from scratch, the brochure has to be written, the landowner letter has to go out, and everyone is already buried. By the time the pack is ready, someone with a bigger team got there first. Not with a better read. With a quicker one.
That is the trap the whole industry is in. Speed used to require headcount. The firm with more analysts moved faster, so the firm with more analysts won. The best small teams lost sites they had read perfectly, to bigger teams who had read them no better.
The thief is not the rival firm. It is the grunt work. The appraisal rebuilt for the hundredth time. The brochure written at midnight. The follow-up that slipped because the person holding it in their head had a busy week. None of that is the work that wins land. It is the work that stops you doing the work that wins land.
And it compounds quietly. You do not lose one site. You lose the site that becomes someone else's flagship, the landowner who tells three others, the margin that would have funded the next deal. You rarely even know how close it was.
For years the only answer was to hire. More people to do more grunt work, which means more cost, more management and a thinner margin on every deal. That is a real choice, and for a lot of firms it is the wrong one, because it solves a speed problem by adding overhead.
There is another way to get the speed back, and it is the reason we built Harold. Take the grunt work off the team instead of adding people to absorb it. Same headcount, same judgement, far more sites moving. A three-person team that runs like a ten-person one.
You do not need to take that on faith, and you do not need to start with the product. Start with the question. How much of last week was your team's actual judgement, and how much was admin dressed up as work? If the honest answer bothers you, that is the gap. It is also where the sites you are losing are going.

Article written by
Sam Sykes


